tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27027547390960130772024-03-13T01:33:00.665-04:00Do The Orders Still Stand?The practice of exercising our 1st Amendment right by exposing the blatant errors, distortions, and lies required for the official 9/11 government conspiracy theory to be valid.Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2702754739096013077.post-62617205944406727612011-09-12T00:11:00.002-04:002009-06-17T12:52:13.388-04:00Do The Orders Still Stand?Welcome to the blog that looks to expose the numerous fallacies, distortions, lies, misquotes, mistruths that the official conspiracy theory requires to be valid.Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta was in the Presidential Emergency Operation Center with Vice President Cheney as Flight 77 approaced Washington, D.C. This plane was unidentified and flying in restricted airspace for over 45 Unknownnoreply@blogger.com10tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2702754739096013077.post-8922919622422204792010-03-17T10:45:00.006-04:002010-03-17T11:50:11.796-04:00The Myth of No Explosives at the World Trade Center ComplexTime and time again, debunkers, pseudo-skeptics, and supporters of the official 9/11 conspiracy theory falsely claim that there were no explosives at the World Trade Center complex on 9/11 because no explosives were heard by eyewitnesses or found on audio tracks from video sources. The following videos using mainstream media accounts and eyewitness testimony prove without question that explosivesUnknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2702754739096013077.post-69820070331420003432009-06-17T11:25:00.005-04:002009-06-17T12:30:58.951-04:00Failure To Imagine Debunked Part 2In a past post, I described how 9/11 Commission panel’s chairman, Tom Kean, famously stated that the main reason the 9/11 attacks were not prevented was that there had been a "failure of imagination" with regards to the attacks and how they were carried out.I can say with 100% certainty that the above excuse is a lie. Thanks to the 9/11 Commissions NORAD Exercise Summary found in the National Unknownnoreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2702754739096013077.post-54415723010914062932007-11-04T09:08:00.000-05:002007-11-04T10:24:32.097-05:00NIST Finds Total Collapse Of Twin Towers From Gravity Alone Is UnexplainableNIST Finds Global Collapse Of Twin Towers From Gravity Alone Is Unexplainable Instead of trying to model the global collapse of two buildings through their greatest path of resistance at nearly free fall speeds via gravity alone, NIST simply surrendered the problem instead of relying on physics because it was too chaotic. The computer models were too complex apparently. In the field of structuralUnknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2702754739096013077.post-73926769278705293012007-03-08T22:03:00.003-05:002008-06-14T01:11:11.097-04:00The Case For Explosives At The World Trade Center: North Tower SublevelI will not attempt the blame game with this premise. I am not a structural engineer or an explosives expert. I do have reasonable doubts about the official story. My research to this point on a personal level has been with a trained explosive expert in the U.S. military and with a construction engineer from Purdue University. I have read reports in support of the NIST (National Institute of Unknownnoreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2702754739096013077.post-15266106924925261622007-03-03T10:38:00.000-05:002007-04-18T14:57:38.942-04:00The NIST and The World Trade Center TowersAfter reviewing the 9/11 Commission Report and the NIST Report on the global collapse of the World Trade Center Towers, I find it very unlikely that the Twin Towers suffered a global collapse strictly due to gravity as the official story explains.Why would I question that official explanation? Afterall they are professional engineers and I am not and we should trust their work. However, there Unknownnoreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2702754739096013077.post-7130825792434298362007-03-01T21:11:00.000-05:002007-04-18T15:06:25.202-04:00The Officiial Excuse for 9/11, 'Failure To Imagine' Excuse Debunked!The Bush Administration offered up the 'failure to imagine' excuse for the response to 9/11.President Bush: "We knew he [Osama bin Laden] had designs on us, we knew he hated us. But there was nobody in our government, and I don't think [in] the prior government, that could envision flying airplanes into buildings on such a massive scale," he said.Pat, from Screwloosechange, of course parrots thisUnknownnoreply@blogger.com0